Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
Author: gb Subject: 1968 vs 1974 models Info: (4470 views) Posted: Wednesday 10-22-08 03:55:40 PM |
You are correct about some models using galvanized bolts. I even saw one this week which had been upgraded to stainless bolts, but the nuts were still a more corrosion-prone material (oops!).
:: I believe that the earlier hulls are considered lighter
:: by many racers, while later numbers, such as my #581,
:: are thought to be heavier and more solid. It is worth
:: noting that Mark Lowry and Soliton did extremely well
:: with one of the later models (somewhere in the 580's, I
:: think). Keep in mind that some of the earlier hulls had
:: aluminum chainplates and, I've heard, galvanized keel
:: bolts. Neither is acceptable.
:: Contact Jan Gryger about mast beam replacement; he's
:: done it.
::
:: Frank Lawler
::
:: :: Hi,
:: ::
:: :: Do you know what differences I will find looking at a
:: :: 1968 s22 vs one from 1974? Any strengths or weaknesses
:: :: particular to those years I should notice?
:: ::
:: :: On a related note, where should I look for info on
:: :: replacing the mast beam?
:: ::
:: :: thanks!
:: ::
:: :: gb
Reply | Post New Message | All Messages | this message is spam |
|